🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.